Where are investors actually buying?
Free investor-purchase counts for 33,642 US ZIP codes — and rankings for the 6,912 with enough sales to rank honestly. Counted from public property records. No score, no black box, no “trust us.”
33,642 residential ZIPs · 3,125 counties · 50 states + DC · 12 months ending 2026-06-03 · compiled 2026-07-05
Ask any list seller — their markets are always hot. Almost none of them will show you a number you can check. So you end up mailing a ZIP because a guru mentioned it, or because it felt busy the last time you drove it — and wondering three months later why the phone didn't ring.
This site does one narrow thing: it counts, from public records, where corporate-entity buyers actually purchased single-family homes in the last 12 months — in every residential ZIP in the country. That's it. You can disagree with what the numbers mean, but you don't have to take our word for what they are.
Start bigger: choose your market first
591 metro and micro areas ranked the same way, with year-over-year change. Pick the market, then drill into its counties and ZIPs — or put two markets side by side.
| # | Market | Investor purchaseslast 12 mo | Per 100 homesinvestor purchases | Changevs prior 12 mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Springfield, MO | 1,616 | 1.6 | +48% |
| 2 | Muncie, IN | 543 | 1.5 | +34% |
| 3 | Oxford, MSmicro | 219 | 1.3 | -9% |
| 4 | Kinston, NCmicro | 238 | 1.2 | +297% |
| 5 | Boise City, ID | 2,281 | 1.2 | +42% |
| 6 | Fort Dodge, IAmicro | 151 | 1.2 | +82% |
| 7 | Vincennes, INmicro | 148 | 1.2 | +151% |
| 8 | Lubbock, TX | 1,119 | 1.1 | +2% |
| 9 | South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI | 1,230 | 1.1 | +73% |
| 10 | Wichita, KS | 2,309 | 1.1 | +41% |
See all 591 ranked markets — filter by state or distance from your ZIP →
The 100 hottest ZIPs in America
Ranked by investor purchases per 100 single-family homes, 12 months ending 2026-06-03. Minimums to qualify: 500 homes, 30 recorded sales, 15 investor purchases; second-home markets excluded (full methodology).
| # | ZIP | County | Investor purchaseslast 12 mo | Per 100 homesinvestor purchases | Share of salesbought by investors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34981 | St. Lucie County, Florida | 154 | 8.5 | 73% |
| 2 | 63137 | St. Louis County, Missouri | 482 | 6.5 | 73% |
| 3 | 67215 | Sedgwick County, Kansas | 127 | 5.4 | 56% |
| 4 | 73543 | Comanche County, Oklahoma | 43 | 5.4 | 72% |
| 5 | 64130 | Jackson County, Missouri | 498 | 5.4 | 67% |
| 6 | 64132 | Jackson County, Missouri | 264 | 5.3 | 60% |
| 7 | 46617 | St. Joseph County, Indiana | 191 | 5.1 | 56% |
| 8 | 63134 | St. Louis County, Missouri | 233 | 4.8 | 64% |
| 9 | 46402 | Lake County, Indiana | 81 | 4.8 | 50% |
| 10 | 63136 | St. Louis County, Missouri | 784 | 4.8 | 60% |
| 11 | 46409 | Lake County, Indiana | 172 | 4.7 | 50% |
| 12 | 46407 | Lake County, Indiana | 183 | 4.7 | 52% |
| 13 | 77051 | Harris County, Texas | 249 | 4.6 | 56% |
| 14 | 28206 | Mecklenburg County, North Carolina | 172 | 4.5 | 50% |
| 15 | 46540 | Elkhart County, Indiana | 161 | 4.4 | 50% |
| 16 | 63135 | St. Louis County, Missouri | 347 | 4.4 | 58% |
| 17 | 65806 | Greene County, Missouri | 75 | 4.4 | 51% |
| 18 | 63133 | St. Louis County, Missouri | 104 | 4.2 | 60% |
| 19 | 77048 | Harris County, Texas | 291 | 4.1 | 60% |
| 20 | 15332 | Washington County, Pennsylvania | 147 | 4.1 | 59% |
| 21 | 76071 | Wise County, Texas | 84 | 3.9 | 54% |
| 22 | 64128 | Jackson County, Missouri | 185 | 3.8 | 54% |
| 23 | 63138 | St. Louis County, Missouri | 194 | 3.7 | 56% |
| 24 | 75210 | Dallas County, Texas | 74 | 3.7 | 46% |
| 25 | 90272 | Los Angeles County, California | 266 | 3.6 | 46% |
| 26 | 33139 | Miami-Dade County, Florida | 34 | 3.6 | 51% |
| 27 | 62206 | St. Clair County, Illinois | 197 | 3.6 | 80% |
| 28 | 32114 | Volusia County, Florida | 221 | 3.6 | 53% |
| 29 | 46613 | St. Joseph County, Indiana | 143 | 3.5 | 44% |
| 30 | 76504 | Bell County, Texas | 246 | 3.5 | 51% |
| 31 | 64109 | Jackson County, Missouri | 91 | 3.5 | 48% |
| 32 | 63121 | St. Louis County, Missouri | 310 | 3.4 | 53% |
| 33 | 64134 | Jackson County, Missouri | 261 | 3.4 | 46% |
| 34 | 16146 | Mercer County, Pennsylvania | 139 | 3.4 | 58% |
| 35 | 76006 | Tarrant County, Texas | 104 | 3.4 | 52% |
| 36 | 67214 | Sedgwick County, Kansas | 169 | 3.3 | 47% |
| 37 | 18603 | Columbia County, Pennsylvania | 63 | 3.3 | 68% |
| 38 | 46016 | Madison County, Indiana | 202 | 3.2 | 43% |
| 39 | 79410 | Lubbock County, Texas | 106 | 3.2 | 44% |
| 40 | 78073 | Bexar County, Texas | 129 | 3.2 | 29% |
| 41 | 68028 | Sarpy County, Nebraska | 235 | 3.2 | 32% |
| 42 | 47713 | Vanderburgh County, Indiana | 95 | 3.1 | 46% |
| 43 | 75215 | Dallas County, Texas | 158 | 3.1 | 42% |
| 44 | 85054 | Maricopa County, Arizona | 63 | 3.1 | 29% |
| 45 | 63703 | Cape Girardeau County, Missouri | 68 | 3.1 | 43% |
| 46 | 46406 | Lake County, Indiana | 103 | 3.0 | 44% |
| 47 | 31647 | Cook County, Georgia | 29 | 3.0 | 76% |
| 48 | 66749 | Allen County, Kansas | 85 | 3.0 | 42% |
| 49 | 32461 | Walton County, Florida | 168 | 3.0 | 31% |
| 50 | 47807 | Vigo County, Indiana | 81 | 3.0 | 39% |
| 51 | 64053 | Jackson County, Missouri | 62 | 3.0 | 37% |
| 52 | 75114 | Kaufman County, Texas | 173 | 3.0 | 49% |
| 53 | 46601 | St. Joseph County, Indiana | 23 | 3.0 | 41% |
| 54 | 44105 | Cuyahoga County, Ohio | 269 | 3.0 | 60% |
| 55 | 33127 | Miami-Dade County, Florida | 98 | 3.0 | 61% |
| 56 | 46225 | Marion County, Indiana | 65 | 2.9 | 34% |
| 57 | 21205 | Baltimore City, Maryland | 130 | 2.9 | 56% |
| 58 | 46404 | Lake County, Indiana | 179 | 2.9 | 44% |
| 59 | 75708 | Smith County, Texas | 106 | 2.9 | 63% |
| 60 | 33034 | Miami-Dade County, Florida | 160 | 2.9 | 20% |
| 61 | 47305 | Delaware County, Indiana | 23 | 2.9 | 38% |
| 62 | 79411 | Lubbock County, Texas | 67 | 2.9 | 43% |
| 63 | 67042 | Butler County, Kansas | 154 | 2.9 | 36% |
| 64 | 64127 | Jackson County, Missouri | 159 | 2.8 | 45% |
| 65 | 64138 | Jackson County, Missouri | 229 | 2.8 | 41% |
| 66 | 67213 | Sedgwick County, Kansas | 199 | 2.8 | 42% |
| 67 | 52246 | Johnson County, Iowa | 97 | 2.8 | 40% |
| 68 | 78152 | Bexar County, Texas | 86 | 2.8 | 41% |
| 69 | 77840 | Brazos County, Texas | 126 | 2.8 | 42% |
| 70 | 65619 | Greene County, Missouri | 82 | 2.8 | 28% |
| 71 | 47302 | Delaware County, Indiana | 278 | 2.8 | 39% |
| 72 | 63111 | St. Louis City, Missouri | 129 | 2.8 | 42% |
| 73 | 34216 | Manatee County, Florida | 30 | 2.8 | 50% |
| 74 | 58047 | Cass County, North Dakota | 70 | 2.8 | 32% |
| 75 | 79401 | Lubbock County, Texas | 22 | 2.7 | 42% |
| 76 | 77021 | Harris County, Texas | 209 | 2.7 | 41% |
| 77 | 46208 | Marion County, Indiana | 191 | 2.7 | 39% |
| 78 | 77801 | Brazos County, Texas | 58 | 2.7 | 48% |
| 79 | 44127 | Cuyahoga County, Ohio | 26 | 2.7 | 79% |
| 80 | 44110 | Cuyahoga County, Ohio | 89 | 2.7 | 67% |
| 81 | 44108 | Cuyahoga County, Ohio | 126 | 2.7 | 62% |
| 82 | 78407 | Nueces County, Texas | 15 | 2.6 | 47% |
| 83 | 33137 | Miami-Dade County, Florida | 32 | 2.6 | 43% |
| 84 | 23832 | Chesterfield County, Virginia | 432 | 2.6 | 37% |
| 85 | 67219 | Sedgwick County, Kansas | 122 | 2.6 | 34% |
| 86 | 34747 | Osceola County, Florida | 400 | 2.6 | 37% |
| 87 | 46408 | Lake County, Indiana | 154 | 2.6 | 41% |
| 88 | 46803 | Allen County, Indiana | 71 | 2.6 | 38% |
| 89 | 76643 | McLennan County, Texas | 123 | 2.6 | 40% |
| 90 | 07501 | Passaic County, New Jersey | 74 | 2.6 | 44% |
| 91 | 28501 | Lenoir County, North Carolina | 155 | 2.6 | 54% |
| 92 | 50525 | Wright County, Iowa | 36 | 2.6 | 42% |
| 93 | 64123 | Jackson County, Missouri | 81 | 2.5 | 40% |
| 94 | 33405 | Palm Beach County, Florida | 131 | 2.5 | 38% |
| 95 | 64129 | Jackson County, Missouri | 70 | 2.5 | 37% |
| 96 | 38012 | Haywood County, Tennessee | 110 | 2.5 | 50% |
| 97 | 23120 | Chesterfield County, Virginia | 178 | 2.5 | 27% |
| 98 | 76011 | Tarrant County, Texas | 54 | 2.5 | 41% |
| 99 | 07108 | Essex County, New Jersey | 67 | 2.4 | 45% |
| 100 | 44311 | Summit County, Ohio | 35 | 2.4 | 58% |
How we count — and what we can't see
Counted, not scored
Every figure is a count or a ratio of two counts from public property records. We publish the definition next to the number, so you can check our math — or redo it yourself.
An honest undercount
“Investor” means a corporate-entity buyer (LLC or corporation). Investors buying in their own name aren't counted — so the real number is higher than ours. We'd rather undercount than guess.
Flagged, not hidden
Small samples, tiny ZIPs, and vacation markets are flagged and left out of the rankings — with the reason stated on the page. This is a July 2026 snapshot, and every page says so.
Hottest ZIPs by state
Every state ranked the same way — 6,912 qualifying ZIPs nationwide.
Straight answers
What is HottestZip?+
HottestZip is a free tool that publishes recorded investor purchases of single-family homes for 33,642 US residential ZIP codes, and ranks the 6,912 ZIPs with enough sales to rank honestly. Every number is a count aggregated from public property records — recorded deeds, foreclosure filings, tax rolls — plus listing statuses, over the 12 months ending June 3, 2026. There is no score and no model: the counts are shown directly.
Where does the data come from?+
From public property records — recorded deeds, mortgages, foreclosure filings, tax rolls — plus listing and vacancy statuses, aggregated nationally across 33,642 residential ZIP codes and 3,125 counties. HottestZip publishes the aggregate counts, not individual records.
What counts as an “investor purchase”?+
A purchase of a single-family home where the buyer is a corporate entity (an LLC or corporation). This is a deliberately conservative definition: investors who buy in their personal name are not counted, so the true investor number in most ZIPs is higher than what we show. We prefer an undercount we can defend to an estimate we can't.
How fresh is the data?+
This edition covers the 12 months ending June 3, 2026, and was compiled on July 5, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed — every page is date-stamped, and if we publish a new edition the dates will change with it.
How are ZIPs ranked?+
By investor purchases per 100 single-family homes over the 12-month window. To be ranked, a ZIP needs at least 500 single-family homes, at least 30 recorded sales, and at least 15 investor purchases, and must not be a second-home market (over 65% absentee-owned). 6,912 ZIPs qualify. Every ZIP — ranked or not — is still searchable with its counts shown.
Why is my ZIP not ranked?+
Usually one of three honest reasons: too few recorded sales to be a reliable sample, too few single-family homes, or a second-home/vacation pattern where absentee ownership doesn't mean rental investors. The ZIP's page says which reason applies and still shows every count we have.
What does the free report include, and what does the email get me?+
The rankings, every ZIP's core numbers (investor purchases, share of sales, turnover), and the methodology are free with no email. An email address unlocks the full ZIP report: year-over-year trend, the distress pipeline (pre-foreclosure, tax-delinquent, vacant counts), buyer mix (flips, cash), owner pools, and a ZIP-vs-county comparison.
Do you sell my email address?+
No. You get the full report, plus occasional emails about investor buying data and what GoForClose offers. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe. We ask for no phone number and no card.
What counts as a “market”?+
The official Census metro and micro area definitions (March 2020 delineations) — so “Omaha metro” correctly includes Council Bluffs across the Iowa line. Markets are ranked by the same per-100-homes yardstick as ZIPs, with year-over-year change shown. To be ranked, a market needs 10,000+ single-family homes, 300+ recorded sales, and 50+ investor purchases, and can't be a vacation market (majority of its homes in second-home-flagged ZIPs). 591 of 927 markets qualify.
What does “per 100 homes” mean?+
Investor purchases divided by the ZIP's single-family housing stock, times 100. It answers: out of every 100 houses in this ZIP, how many did an investor buy in the last 12 months? It lets a 4,000-home ZIP be compared fairly with a 20,000-home ZIP.
Why do you exclude vacation and second-home markets from the rankings?+
In ZIPs where over 65% of homes are absentee-owned, corporate buying usually reflects vacation rentals and seasonal money, not the buy-and-hold or flip investing most operators mean by “hot.” Those ZIPs are excluded from rankings — but flagged and fully viewable, with the reason stated on the page.
Is this really free? What's the catch?+
The rankings and core numbers are free with no email. The deeper ZIP and market reports cost an email address. HottestZip is powered by GoForClose, a done-for-you direct mail service for real estate investors — publishing the counts is how we show our work. If you never buy anything from us, the tool still works exactly the same.
Does HottestZip cover every ZIP code?+
It covers 33,642 residential ZIP codes across all 50 states and Washington DC — single-family homes only. PO-box ZIPs, non-residential ZIPs, and US territories are not included. 3,388 very small ZIPs (fewer than 20 single-family homes) are shown but not measured, because samples that small produce fake-precise numbers.